jcatgrl:

copperbadge:

persinetteinthetower:

moriartythetease:

So what happens if two people who have promised their firstborn to separate witches have a child together? Do they both just pop up in the nursery and have a custody battle?

I need a book about a little girl whose parents had promised their firstborn to different witches and the only way that both ends of the deal were fulfilled was for them to have joint custody of the child.

I love it!

And then the witches, forced to share a cottage while raising their joint stolen child, fall in love…

(via emmaaa-swan)

Cullen and letters to his sister

inquisitortrevelyann:

Just a reminder that we found out that Cullen has a sister and brother.
So now I’ve got this idea that Cullen writes his sister off and on since he was stationed at the Circle of Magi at Lake Calenhad. They stopped for a while, during and shortly after Uldred’s takeover. And when they started up again, they were noticeably darker and harsher. They remained the same - mentioning calls for mage circle reforms and harsher punishments - before they began to became lighter again.
Then they stopped for a while and his sister thought the worst. But then he’s writing back, telling her about this woman that he’s been tasked with advising. She’s quietly stubborn, silent yet blunt when she does open her mouth. And she’s a mage, one of the dangers he once fought to contain in Ferelden and Kirkwall.
Slowly, the letters change from distrust to grudging admiration; she’s earned loyalty from all of his men and more are flocking to her cause everyday. All of this, for a mage leading a cause that some call heresy. His respect for her is clear and his sister thinks that it might be a hint of something else too.
Then there’s the day he sends a letter full of double meaning, love and hope and happiness, and his sister realizes just how much he’s changed - for the better.

nowyoukno:

lonewolfpawprints:

coelasquid:

nowyoukno:

(Sources: 1, 2, 3) Follow Nowyoukno for more.

I always thought the “but satisfaction brought him back” part was a joke from the Munsters.

Here’s another one: “Jack of all trades, master of none,” is just one half of the saying. The other half reads “but better than a master of one.”

Okay one more: “Ignorance is bliss” is also only half of the saying. It’s “When ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise.”
nowyoukno:

lonewolfpawprints:

coelasquid:

nowyoukno:

(Sources: 1, 2, 3) Follow Nowyoukno for more.

I always thought the “but satisfaction brought him back” part was a joke from the Munsters.

Here’s another one: “Jack of all trades, master of none,” is just one half of the saying. The other half reads “but better than a master of one.”

Okay one more: “Ignorance is bliss” is also only half of the saying. It’s “When ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise.”
nowyoukno:

lonewolfpawprints:

coelasquid:

nowyoukno:

(Sources: 1, 2, 3) Follow Nowyoukno for more.

I always thought the “but satisfaction brought him back” part was a joke from the Munsters.

Here’s another one: “Jack of all trades, master of none,” is just one half of the saying. The other half reads “but better than a master of one.”

Okay one more: “Ignorance is bliss” is also only half of the saying. It’s “When ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise.”
nowyoukno:

lonewolfpawprints:

coelasquid:

nowyoukno:

(Sources: 1, 2, 3) Follow Nowyoukno for more.

I always thought the “but satisfaction brought him back” part was a joke from the Munsters.

Here’s another one: “Jack of all trades, master of none,” is just one half of the saying. The other half reads “but better than a master of one.”

Okay one more: “Ignorance is bliss” is also only half of the saying. It’s “When ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise.”
nowyoukno:

lonewolfpawprints:

coelasquid:

nowyoukno:

(Sources: 1, 2, 3) Follow Nowyoukno for more.

I always thought the “but satisfaction brought him back” part was a joke from the Munsters.

Here’s another one: “Jack of all trades, master of none,” is just one half of the saying. The other half reads “but better than a master of one.”

Okay one more: “Ignorance is bliss” is also only half of the saying. It’s “When ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise.”

nowyoukno:

lonewolfpawprints:

coelasquid:

nowyoukno:

(Sources: 1, 2, 3) Follow Nowyoukno for more.

I always thought the “but satisfaction brought him back” part was a joke from the Munsters.

Here’s another one: “Jack of all trades, master of none,” is just one half of the saying. The other half reads “but better than a master of one.”

Okay one more: “Ignorance is bliss” is also only half of the saying. It’s “When ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise.”

(via voiceofthetunnels)

loki-has-a-tardis:

This is honestly the best poster I have found in a while supporting breast cancer awareness. I am honestly so sick of seeing, “set the tatas free” and “save the boobies”. There is no reason in hell a life threatening, life ruining disease should be sexualized. “Don’t wear a bra day,” go fuck yourselves. You’re not saving a pair of tits, you’re saving the entire package: mind, body, and soul included. Women are not just a pair of breasts.

loki-has-a-tardis:

This is honestly the best poster I have found in a while supporting breast cancer awareness. I am honestly so sick of seeing, “set the tatas free” and “save the boobies”. There is no reason in hell a life threatening, life ruining disease should be sexualized. “Don’t wear a bra day,” go fuck yourselves. You’re not saving a pair of tits, you’re saving the entire package: mind, body, and soul included. Women are not just a pair of breasts.

(via forgot-my-glasses)